Seed Round • Making AI Insurable
Proof Infrastructure for AI Systems
Cryptographic attestation that AI guardrails actually executed
The Thesis
"AI is becoming the execution layer for material decisions."
Clinical recommendations. Loan approvals. Legal research. Autonomous driving. Material risks require independent verification.
NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 define acceptable community practice. Your legal team needs to point to it. GLACIS provides the proof you're meeting it.
The Market
AI Governance & Compliance (3-5% of AI spend)
Regulated Industries (Healthcare + FinServ + Legal)
Healthcare AI Governance by 2030 (35% CAGR)
$10.9M avg breach cost. Strictest regulation (HIPAA, FDA). Clearest liability. Win here, and every other vertical follows.
The compliance tax is coming. Just like 3-5% of IT spend goes to security/compliance, the same pattern will emerge for AI.
Platform Vision
Clinical AI, ambient scribes, diagnostic support, prior auth
$1.4B SAM
Trading algorithms, credit decisions, fraud detection, robo-advisors
$1.8B SAM
Legal research AI, contract review, autonomous vehicles
$1.3B SAM
The "SSL Certificate for AI" — every regulated AI decision
$24-40B TAM
"Why start with healthcare?"
Hardest compliance environment = strongest proof point. HIPAA and FDA create the most rigorous test case. If we can prove compliance here, every other vertical is easier.
Regulatory Forcing Functions
Jun 2026:
Colorado AI Act ($20K/violation)
Aug 2026:
EU AI Act (full enforcement)
Jan 2027:
California ADMT (healthcare)
The Problem
"We have guardrails."
Every AI vendor says this. Zero can prove it. Healthcare AI companies like Hippocratic AI, Nabla, and Abridge all claim "grounded, verifiable insights" — but have no independent proof the guardrails actually executed.
400-question security surveys. Months of back-and-forth. By the time IT clears it, the physician who wanted it has lost interest.
Operators submit a ticket for software review and have zero visibility into where it stands. No one advocates. Deals stall.
Mutable logs can be edited. Screenshots can be faked. Post-hoc monitoring only tells you what was supposed to happen — not what did happen.
The real problem: It's not missing guardrails. It's missing proof that guardrails executed — independent, tamper-evident, cryptographic proof.
The Solution
GKE / ECS / Lambda
PII Redaction
Policy Check
Receipt Sign
OpenAI / Anthropic / Vertex
Attestation anchoring & audit export (Zero PHI egress)
Competitive Moat
"Can AWS Bedrock Guardrails attest that my team never leaked PHI to OpenAI?"
No — hyperscalers only see their own traffic. Multi-cloud governance requires independent attestation.
Why hyperscalers can't replicate: Conflict of interest. AWS can't independently attest that AWS guardrails worked. Regulators and insurers require third-party verification.
Self-attestation fails the insurance test.
Independent verification becomes mandatory when liability is on the line.
The Business
Regulators define the floor. Insurers set the price.
1.
Health systems install to
unblock procurement
2.
Usage scales with inference volume (Direct
Revenue)
3.
Data proves reduced risk profile to
carriers
4.
Insurers mandate usage for coverage (The
Moat)
"Vanta scales with headcount. GLACIS scales with inference volume."
$499 platform fee + $0.002/inference. Lightweight WASM at the edge — we capture value without compute weight.
$50K-200K annually. Custom policy engines, dedicated witness nodes, carrier integrations, compliance exports (OSCAL, ISO 42001).
Endgame: GLACIS attestation becomes the FICO score for AI risk. Premium discounts for attested systems.
Traction
Converting to paid pilots Q1 2026
Healthcare AI vendors with active PHI leakage concerns and 18-month procurement cycles blocking deployments
Working platform (~40ms latency, crypto attestation)
Core IP filed (Fenwick & West)
OSSP open standard published
Delaware C-corp, data room ready
AI2 Incubator ($600K) • Cloudflare Launchpad • Sourdough Ventures
2 Design Partners: Healthcare AI vendors — converting to paid Q1
HLTH 2025: 15+ qualified conversations with ambient scribe vendors
EHR Vendors: Active PHI leakage concerns driving urgency
Insurance carriers (Lloyd's, Hartford)
Healthcare AI companies claiming "grounded, verifiable insights" need independent proof those claims are true. GLACIS provides the attestation layer they can't build themselves.
Team
Scaled SwiftKey to 1B+ devices
SwiftKey: Founding exec. $250M exit to Microsoft.
Cambridge Law • Healthcare AI experience
FDA Authorization for AI
Cognoa: Medical Director, first FDA-authorized AI diagnostic.
CHAI Coalition: Drafting standard of care for AI governance.
Rust/WASM systems at billion-scale
WPI Robotics Faculty • Wayfair: Staff engineer, <10ms ML infra
Patents: Edge-deployable cryptographic consensus.
Advisors
Why this team: We've scaled consumer AI to a billion devices, navigated FDA medical device authorization, and seen firsthand how health systems evaluate AI vendors. GLACIS exists because we lived the compliance gap.
Network Access
CHAI Coalition connections to 50+ health systems. AI2 portfolio introductions. Cloudflare enterprise distribution.
The Ask
Core platform & integrations
Coverage & integrations
Design partner conversion
IP & carrier partnerships
3+ Live Pilots
1M+ Attestations
First Carrier Integration
$1.5M ARR
~12 enterprise customers
In 18 months, you won't deploy AI in regulated industries without independent proof of control.
Seattle-based. AI2-backed. Building the compliance infrastructure the world needs.