Infrastructure

Why we built Glacis on Cloudflare Workers

How distributed edge infrastructure supports fast supervision, signed operational records, and resilient AI workflows.

6 min read
Joe Braidwood
Joe Braidwood
Co-founder & CEO
Published December 2025 · updated August 2026 · 6 min read

We chose Cloudflare Workers because infrastructure choices matter. It lets us place supervision, record generation, and verification close to the action path while measuring the overhead each workflow can tolerate.

Cloudflare
Cloudflare Workers
Edge runtime infrastructure

Latency matters for operational evidence

Security questionnaires, periodic audits, and policy documents serve a different purpose from event-level operating records. AI workflows may produce many actions between reviews, and each workflow has its own latency, evidence, and legal requirements.

Consequential AI workflows leave little room for evidence overhead. We chose an edge runtime to keep supervision and signing close to the action instead of hauling every event through a central region. Every deployment still measures end-to-end p50, p95, p99, error, and failover behavior against its own latency budget.

Near
Keep supervision close to the action path
Global
Use distributed edge infrastructure
Measured
Test tail latency, errors, and failover

Why edge execution matters

Cloudflare’s globally distributed network lets Glacis run compute, storage, and security services close to request paths. That architecture reduces unnecessary distance in the hot path and gives us regional options for deployments with stricter data and resilience requirements.

Traditional Cloud

  • Centralized data centers
  • Distance and routing can add latency
  • Cold-start behavior varies by service and configuration
  • Residency and legal requirements need explicit architecture review

Cloudflare Edge

  • Distributed edge network
  • Services designed to run near users and traffic ingress
  • Runtime behavior must be measured for the configured path
  • Regional controls for data-sovereignty architectures

Keeping the evidence path close to the request can reduce unnecessary cross-region traffic. Shared identifiers and timestamps let operators correlate a signed record with existing transaction telemetry, giving review teams a clearer operational trail.

Security at the infrastructure level

Cloudflare’s managed security services give Glacis a strong infrastructure baseline while we apply product-specific controls above it:

DDoS Protection

Cloudflare’s network-level DDoS protection helps absorb attacks before they reach the application path.

Web Application Firewall

Managed WAF rules add a configurable layer against common web attacks at the edge.

Zero Trust Security

Identity-aware access controls protect operator and service paths, while signed records bind declared actors to covered actions and outcomes.

What this means for AI teams

The platform choice gives AI teams a practical set of deployment options:

  • Measured overhead: receipt and verification latency tested against the workflow’s budget
  • Distributed routing: provider routing and failover capabilities evaluated for the selected services
  • Regional control options: architectures that can be configured around data-sovereignty requirements
  • Managed security options: DDoS, WAF, and bot controls where selected and configured
  • Signed application records: key-based integrity and attribution checks for covered fields; no hardware-attestation claim unless separately implemented and verified

For healthcare AI vendors: the HIPAA Security Rule includes audit controls at 45 C.F.R. § 164.312(b). A configured evidence path can aim to generate tamper-evident records near the transaction path, but latency and user impact must be measured and HIPAA applicability assessed for the actual deployment.

Why the platform choice matters

Cloudflare’s support for distributed traffic, edge execution, and managed security controls gives Glacis a strong substrate for supervision that has to happen in the path of a live AI action.

When selected and configured, those platform properties can support:

  • Capacity and failure-mode testing against an agreed workload
  • Current provider support, service lifecycle, and security documentation evaluated during diligence
  • A distributed execution option rather than a mandatory centralized evidence hop

Primary sources

Infrastructure for operational evidence

AI rules and buyer requirements vary by system, role, jurisdiction, and date. Reviewers may ask for operating evidence alongside policies, testing, and assessments; neither Cloudflare infrastructure nor a signed record determines compliance.

Periodic audits and documentation remain useful, but they may not answer what a configured control reported for a particular consequential event. Signed records can add integrity and attribution for covered fields while trusted collection, testing, and coverage evidence address actual execution and effectiveness.

We chose Cloudflare Workers in 2025 to explore a distributed, measurable path for generating and verifying signed operational records. Current architecture, latency, security controls, and data flows must be established from the deployed configuration rather than inferred from this launch post.

Pango waving

Ready to see it in action?

Discuss operational supervision and evidence for a consequential AI workflow.

Talk to us